Category Archives: Newspaper Archive

Dr. Jerry Morris — President, American Board of Medical Psychology

Article archive / March 1, 2011

Originally published: . Volume 2, No. 7. Source pages: 2, 15, 16.

After several years of serving on the board of the Academy of Medical Psychology and American Board of Medical Psychology the board has done me the honor to elect me President of the specialty board for the next two years. As I take that position we are reorganizing and automating the office and business functions to have faster and more efficient communication within the specialty and those students and interested doctors in the Academy who may or may not ever become board certified.

Board certification in medical psychology requires extensive training and demonstration of expertise. The specialist/diplomate in Medical Psychology must have extensive training at the post doctorate and post licensure level in the specialty. That training must go beyond simply becoming a Psychopharmacologist, but must follow the tenets of those designing Integrated Care for the nation where specialists in Medical Psychology will need to be able to diagnose and treat mental disorders with psychotherapy and medications (at a prescribing or consulting; LIII and LII functions) and be able to treat the psychological aspects of physical disorders (e.g. CHD, Obesity, Hypertension, Diabetes and especially juvenile onset diabetes, nicotine addiction and other addictions, and other disorders identified as negative cost drains on healthcare resources that have psychological and life- style components). Diplomates in the specialty of Medical Psychology have to pass a preceptorship, a national oral examination, and now a national written examination. Thus, the next generation of Medical Psychologist Diplomates is the best prepared psychologists to fill the large shows of placement in most Primary Care Centers and Medical/Surgical Hospitals under the emerging and efficacy validated Integrated Care Model.

This has not occurred without riff and the usual fractionation in psychology and the disciplines of healthcare in general. In the state of Louisiana there has been confusion about terminology and the term Medical Psychologist has been statutorily applied to what the rest of the world and many sub disciplines in national associations call “psychopharmacologists”. That is unfortunate, but happens in budding specialties that are formative, emerging, and evolving. A narrow vision of the specialty of Medical Psychology as a

Psychopharmacologist runs the risk of developing the devastating practice style (as evidenced by the decline of status of psychiatrists) of “seeing only or even largely patients for medication checks”. That would have a very debilitating effect on the psychologist’s ability to provide the needed functions in Integrated Care and would render us just another discipline that could be more economically replaced with a $60,000 per year nurse practitioner. The concept of our Academy and Specialty is much more appropriate for meeting the need of the emerging and evolving healthcare system.

We conceptualize the Specialist in Medical Psychology as much more than the pharmacologist (likened to Physician’s Assistants, Nurse Practitioners, and most Psychiatrists these days). Background in health psychology, clinical psychology, psychopharmacology, behaviorism, and prevention are essential to working in the Primary Care Centers of America. Psychopharmacology training and experience diagnosing mental disorders and selecting and/or prescribing medications within our specialty is also essential. We have analyzed the evolving healthcare models and systems and attempted to position psychology and the specialty in the best position to become an essential component of the Primary Care and Hospital Systems of America. We have concluded that the specialty of Medical Psychology fills such an important gap that exists in America’s Primary Care Systems that Diplomates in the specialty should be required in all Primary Care Centers and Hospitals in America. Therefore, we have joined organizations such as the national practitioner association for psychologists (www.nappp.org;http://www.truthindrugs.co m/) that have brought the public and professions increased knowledge about the scientific evidence of the significant limits of “medication only approaches” (really the only approach offered by most Primary Care Centers and Hospitals in America). We have developed clear standards which clarify the very different skill levels of psychopharmacologists (whether in psychiatry, psychology, advanced practice

nursing, etc.) and specialists in Medical Psychology.

In the state of Louisiana we are likely to lose about 15 of the slightly over 30 Diplomates in Medical Psychology because there is resistance to facing the broader vision of the specialty and a natural resentment because, in the state, the evolving specialty confabulated the concepts of psychopharmacologist and medical psychology. Further, a break with the traditions established by many of us who helped write and lobby state licensing laws occurred in Louisiana when psychologists set up a psychopharmacology law that is supervised by the board of another discipline. Thus, to continue their psychology specialty as one of our Diplomates Louisiana psychopharmacologists would have to maintain their license under the psychology licensing board and also maintain their other license under the Medical Board sub board. This places a financial and philosophical hardship on some of our diplomats and creates a natural resentment because of the unique licensing laws formulated in the state. Many of our Diplomates have written us and are happy to maintain both licenses and will retain their specialty board certification in Medical Psychology, others will act out their preference, right, and/or resentment about the situation by blaming a projection entity and losing their qualification for retaining their specialty board certification. The whole frame is unnecessary, unfortunate, and was not thought through well in conception. It is fraught with the dangers long conceptualized and avoided in psychology licensure efforts of “avoiding regulation under the power dynamics of another profession”. Still, our board will maintain high standards, our fidelity to the traditions of psychology licensure as a base for our specialty training, and our independence from other

professions. We love and respect our Louisiana Diplomates (the ones that continue their specialty board certification, and the ones that feel compelled to lose this status) and empathize with the bind that they have found themselves.

On a happier note, our specialty is delighted to have many active prescribing (LIII psychopharmacology) members from the Military, New Mexico, and Louisiana, and we realize that ultimately our specialty will be dominated by consulting psychopharmacology practice (LII). Both, in our opinion, carry a very important burden and function in the new and evolving healthcare system and in the Medical Psychology Specialty. Clearly, our LII diplomats will become increasingly in demand in Primary Care setting where general physicians will have to continue to prescribe as much as 70% of the psychoactive medications and will need accurate psychological diagnoses and multi-intervention treatment plans. The Medical Psychologist is the essential missing part that will equip the Primary Care Center and local Hospital to match medications with the appropriate diagnosis and to use change oriented psychotherapy in combination with symptom controlling medications. There has never been a better and more encouraging time for our specialty. Many of our physician colleagues and friends will be able to salvage their reputations that have been dampened by the public’s growing

awareness of the significant and scientifically chronicled limits of medication approaches by demonstrating solid collaboration with psychologists who are colleagues and housed within their centers. Wise physicians will embrace the science, add psychologists to their practices, and lay claim to the mantel of scientific, healthcare leader, and teamwork oriented.

I am encouraged by the future of our specialty of Medical Psychology and am very proud of our Louisiana Diplomates. I am also encouraged by the many who are not intending to qualify for board certification but have joined the Academy of Medical Psychology because of their interest in the expanding area and related study and society affiliation. I am very proud of our LII consulting psychopharmacologists and Board Certified Medical Psychologists who are changing the image and contributions of psychologists in the Primary Care Centers and Hospitals across the country. The general physicians I’ve talked to across the country are developing a new appreciation for how mental illness and the psychological aspects of physical illness are much more complex than basic biology and pharmacology and for the contribution that psychologists can make to their practices and patients.

He is a Board Certified Medical Psychologist. (Dr. Morris is licensed in Louisiana. He serves as the director of behavioral health for four primary care centers and a hospital complex affiliated with his psychologist owned comprehensive community mental health center, where he may be contacted at jmorris@bcmhospital.com.)


This article is part of a historical newspaper archive. Read the original issue for its original layout, photographs and graphics.

From the Minutes: A potpourri of things from the Board.

Article archive / March 1, 2011

Originally published: . Volume 2, No. 7. Source pages: 5.

The Psychology Board met in January to work on long range planning. The meeting took place at their office in Baton Rouge, on January 14th and 15th.

The board members conducted regular business, approved minutes, reviewed complaints, examined candidates, and heard committee reports, including the upcoming awards ceremony and the report of the Behavioral Health Working Group representatives.

Discussions included “Guidelines for LPCs Conducting Child Custody Evaluations,” and the AG Opinion 09- 0221. This opinion concerned those who might serve on both the LSBEP and the

Medical Psychology Advisory Committee, among other issues. The opinion is reviewed in PT Vol 2 No 5.

Legislative issues and the board’s opinion regarding “Supervision Toward Licensure” were listed for discussion.

Also listed was “Telepsychology” and “Assessing Continued Competency,” a topic that is receiving attention at the ASPPB (Association of State and Provincial Psychology Boards).

Dr. Tony Young told the Times that he would provide more information on this topic as the board continues to formulate its ideas and directions in the coming months.


This article is part of a historical newspaper archive. Read the original issue for its original layout, photographs and graphics.

NAPPP Causes Stir with Campaign

Article archive / March 1, 2011

Originally published: . Volume 2, No. 7. Source pages: 10.

Members of several physician organizations, including the American Medical Association and American Academy of Family Physicians, wrote to John Caccavale, Ph.D., Executive Director of the National Association of Professional Psychology Providers on February 4th to express “great disappointment” in NAPPP’s “Truth In Drugs” campaign. They noted that many of the materials of the campaign were “erroneous at best and misleading at worst,” and directed NAPPP to cease distribution and issue a correction.

APA published a formal statement “APA Raises Serious Concerns About Message, Tone of NAPPP Ad Campaign.” APA noted that APA is a proponent of integrated, interdisciplinary health care…” They said the advertisements “denigrate the role of primary care physicians…” and may be harmful to both professions and that NAPPP in no way speaks for psychology.


This article is part of a historical newspaper archive. Read the original issue for its original layout, photographs and graphics.

LPA Annual Convention To Provide CEs April 14–16

Article archive / March 1, 2011

Originally published: . Volume 2, No. 7. Source pages: 16.

Dr. Phillip Griffin, LPA President-Elect and program chair told the Times that he is “very excited about our CE offerings” this year at the LPA Annual Convention, to be held in Baton Rouge, April 14 to 16.

“We have two three-hour ethics presentations,” Phil noted. “One general and one focusing on HIV/AIDS issues.” Also, “We have three child focused presentations and a couple more that overlap adult and child.”

“An invited speaker, Michael Schwartz Ph.D., a board member of division 42, will present on ‘Early Career Development.’ And Alexander Quiros Ph.D., of Pearson, is giving two three- hour workshops, one child focused (NEPSY II), the other adult focused (WMS IV).”

Phil noted that another invited speaker, “Dan Egli Ph.D., will be giving two three-hour psychopharmacology talks, one focusing on major depression, the second one focuses on OCD.” And Dr. Joseph Tramontana will present on sports psychology.

Above professors from Louisiana Tech outline issues for research at the Fall Meeting 2010.


This article is part of a historical newspaper archive. Read the original issue for its original layout, photographs and graphics.

LPA Election Statements — introduction

Article archive / March 1, 2011

Originally published: . Volume 2, No. 7. Source pages: 17.

The Times sent email requests to those running for office this year in the state association, asking for statements and photos. The Times publisher appreciates all those who responded, and for all attempts to stay within the word count limit, as futile as some of those attempts were. Below are the responses.

Good luck to all our candidates!


This article is part of a historical newspaper archive. Read the original issue for its original layout, photographs and graphics.

Dr. Bryan Gros — Candidate for President-Elect

Article archive / March 1, 2011

Originally published: . Volume 2, No. 7. Source pages: 17.

“Thank you so much for this opportunity to speak regarding my candidacy for President-Elect of LPA.

LPA is a vital organization! While serving the membership on LPA’s Executive Committee as a Director, these words have continued to ring true. I’ve found this experience more invigorating and rewarding than I had ever hoped. I have always viewed LPA and the EC as an extension of the membership. With that in mind, my primary and over-riding goal would be to strengthen representation of the voices of not only the membership at large, but all individual members. I am a staunch believer in a voice for all and would not only welcome, but actively seek out, member input and participation and give such input the highest priority. While I am not naïve enough to believe or even hope that members will agree on every issue, I firmly believe that LPA can be unified and stronger. I am determined in this regard.

It is no secret that our profession is being encroached upon. LPA has made great strides in fending off such threats. With these ongoing concerns, I am also determined to firmly protect our profession and to strongly promote the autonomous functioning of psychologists in Louisiana.

Finally, I believe LPA has untapped potential within psychologists and students who have not yet joined LPA. An additional and literally far- reaching goal would be a pro- active and progressive statewide recruiting campaign. I believe LPA can and must recruit and retain members in order to further strengthen our vital organization.

I am grateful for this opportunity to speak to you all. As president- elect I will remain dedicated to LPA and the profession of psychology in Louisiana.

Warmest regards,


This article is part of a historical newspaper archive. Read the original issue for its original layout, photographs and graphics.

Two Important Resources For EBP

Article archive / February 1, 2011

Originally published: . Volume 2, No. 6. Source pages: 9.

The Society of Clinical Psychology (APA Division 12) and SAMHSA (Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration) have excellent websites for Evidence- Based Practice information.

The Div 12 website can be found via PsychologicalTreatments.org.

For SAMHSA’s site go to nrepp.samhsa.gov, the National Registry of Evidence-Based Programs and Practices.


This article is part of a historical newspaper archive. Read the original issue for its original layout, photographs and graphics.

SEPA To Hold Convention Jacksonville, FL, March 2-5

Article archive / February 1, 2011

Originally published: . Volume 2, No. 6. Source pages: 12.

The Southeastern Psychological Association (SEPA) will hold its 57th Annual Meeting March 2-5 at the Riverfront in Jacksonville, Florida. This year’s conference offers seminars and CEs in topics including treatment, ethics, teaching, publishing, research, and also a number of leisure activities to enjoy. Dr. Rosemary Hays-Thomas, SEPA administrative officer notes that the Hyatt Regency is located on the “walkable area on the banks of the St. John’s River,” convenient to parks, museums, trolleys, the skyway, and surrounded by Atlantic beaches of the historical city.

Highlights of the conference include Invited Addresses: Dr. Myrna F. Schwartz, neuropsychologist and expert in aphasia, and the Associate Director of the Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute in Philadelphia; Dr. Sam Gosling, personality/social psychologist, University of Texas at Austin will speak on “Snoop Dreams: The expression of personality in everyday contexts;” and Dr. Alice F. Healy, cognitive psychologist from the University of Colorado. For more information go to sepaonline.com.


This article is part of a historical newspaper archive. Read the original issue for its original layout, photographs and graphics.

NAPPP Launches “Truth In Drugs” Campaign

Article archive / February 1, 2011

Originally published: . Volume 2, No. 6. Source pages: 15.

The National Association of Professional Psychology Providers (NAPPP) has launched a national public education effort to “restore psychotherapy as the first line treatment for behavioral disorders” and to help stop physicians from prescribing medications for behavioral disorders proven to be “ineffective, costly and harmful,” according to the January 6th press release.

“Physicians are treating patients complaining of behavioral disorders with medications doctors know, or should know, are no more effective than sugar pills,” said Dr. John Caccavale, Executive Director of NAPPP. “Every day, physicians, who are untrained and lack the expertise to diagnose possible mental health problems, are prescribing drugs, which do not work, for conditions patients may not even have. We are failing patients in need of quality mental health services.”

The “Truth in Drugs Campaign” calls on doctors, patients, family members and community organizations to unite behind new standards of patient care so that millions of Americans receive the mental health services they need and deserve.

“Poor outcomes associated with inappropriate psychotropic prescribing regimens are based on compromised science generated by drug manufacturers. Drug companies spend vast sums on advertising to convince consumers these drugs are the answer to their problems and provide perks and financial incentives for physicians to prescribe them,” added Dr. Caccavale. “Psychotropic medications should only be considered after a patient has been fully evaluated and diagnosed by a doctoral level specialist in behavioral health and has failed to significantly improve from non medication intervention,” he noted.

NAPPP invites individuals and organizations to “unite behind our principles to assure that youth and adults receive the best and most appropriate care possible.” For more information about the Truth in Drugs Campaign and how to become involved, visit www.truthindrugs.com and the The NAPPP Website.


This article is part of a historical newspaper archive. Read the original issue for its original layout, photographs and graphics.

Louisiana Perspectives: LPA Century Members

Article archive / February 1, 2011

Originally published: . Volume 2, No. 6. Source pages: 16.

Louisiana Perspectives A Look Back at Important Events and Trends LPA Century Members – 1998

Glenn A. Ally, Ph.D.

Jimmie D. Cole, Ph.D.

Thomas C. Fain, Ph.D., ABPP

Phillip T. Griffin, Ph.D., ABPP

Murelle G. Harrision, Ph.D.

Daniel Lonowski, Ph.D.

Julie B. Nelson, Ph.D.

James W. Quillin, Ph.D.

Marsha H. Redden, Ph.D.

Tommy T. Stigall, Ph.D.

Beverly A. Stubblefield, Ph.D.

(From the 1998 Membership Directory, Fiftieth Anniversary Edition, Editor Dr. Tom Stigall.)

LPA Century Members 2010

Platinum Level

Julie B. Nelson, Ph.D.

John Simoneaux, Ph.D.

Gold Level

Judith P. Levy, Ph.D., MP

Daniel J. Lonowski, Ph.D.

William G. McCown, Ph.D.

Silver Level

Gayle R. Baer, Ph.D.

Kevin J. Bianchini, Ph.D.

Cathy O. Castille, Ph.D., M.P.

Michael Chafetz, Ph.D.

Joseph E. Comaty, Ph.D., M.P.

Brenda Dawson, Ph.D.

Jeanne L. George, Ph.D.

Phillip T. Griffin, Ph.D.

David B. Hale, Ph.D.

Henry J. Lagarde, Ph.D.

Bruce K. McCormick, Ph.D., M.P.

Darlyne G. Nemeth, Ph.D.,M.P.

Patricia D. Post, Ph.D.

Linda R. Upton, Ph.D., M.P.

Thomas M. Welsh, Ph.D.

Carolyn A. Weyand, Ph.D.

“Century Members” make additional contributions to the Louisiana Psychological Association and, according to the regular announcements, these members are “recognized for their commitment to the profession of psychology and its advancement in Louisiana.”


This article is part of a historical newspaper archive. Read the original issue for its original layout, photographs and graphics.

Up-Coming Events

Article archive / February 1, 2011

Originally published: . Volume 2, No. 6. Source pages: 16.

What Makes People Happy? 2/11/11 – Lafayette, The Holiday Inn

Survivors of Child Sexual Abuse 2/18/11 – Baton Rouge, The Marriott 3/18/11 – Monroe, The Atrium Professional Training Resources www.professionaltrainingresourcesinc.com

57th Annual Meeting Southeastern Psychological Association March 2-5 Hyatt Regency Riverfront Jacksonville, Florida

63rd Annual Fall Convention Louisiana Psychological Association April 14-16 Baton Rouge

Dr. Kelley Pears hands out forms at the last LPA Annual Meeting. The 63rd Convention is to be held in Baton Rouge this spring, April 14-16.


This article is part of a historical newspaper archive. Read the original issue for its original layout, photographs and graphics.

Governor To Protect Higher Education in Next Budget

Article archive / February 1, 2011

Originally published: . Volume 2, No. 6. Source pages: 1, 4.

Cuts “less than 10 percent” Governor To Protect Higher Education in Next Budget

In a speech Monday to members of Louisiana’s college boards, Governor Jindal described his reform proposals for Louisiana’s higher education. According to the press release, the Governor noted that a number of reforms and key gains have been made but that there is still work to do.

“Through the use of creative solutions to protect higher education services while improving outcomes,” he said to the group, “we expect the reduction to higher education to now be less than 10 percent.”

Last week the Board of Regents announced 459 academic programs are being reviewed for low numbers of graduates. These college programs from across the state may be cut or consolidated as a step toward budget reductions.

The Regents have set criteria for “low-completer” programs. Doctoral programs at risk are those that have fewer than two graduates per year, or six in three years. Masters programs must reach the criteria of five graduates per year and undergraduate programs need eight graduates per year.

This criterion places the Specialist in School Psychology (SSP) program at University of Louisiana Monroe at risk and also the SSP school program at LSU Shreveport in a position to be monitored, according to reports on the Regent’s website. Both programs are noted to be a “72-hour, predominantly post-master’s course of study.” The reports note that there is a strong need for graduates. Additional discussions and reviews will continue until the Regents vote on the matter in April.

This is the third review since 2009 in efforts to streamline the state’s education system. “This review however, is the most stringent…” it was noted in the announcement. Two hundred and forty-five programs have already been eliminated or consolidated.


This article is part of a historical newspaper archive. Read the original issue for its original layout, photographs and graphics.

Controversy in LPA Continues

Article archive / February 1, 2011

Originally published: . Volume 2, No. 6. Source pages: 1, 5.

In a continuing controversy that began with the passage of Act 251 in June 2009, Dr. Alicia Pellegrin attended the January 15th meeting of the LPA Executive Council to ask how a list of names on a special petition came to be in the possession of Dr. Jim Quillin only hours after it had been submitted to the LPA Council.

Pellegrin told the Times, “I went there to ask some important and specific questions,” regarding exactly how Quillin acquired the list of names. Dr. Quillin is not an LPA member but is a key figure in the development and passage of Act 251, a bill developed by LAMP in conjunction with the state Medical Board.

The leaked names were some of those polled by Dr. Susan Dardard last fall (see PT, 2, 3), and who supported a resolution for the independent regulation of psychology. Dardard presented this information and a compromise resolution to the LPA Council on October 22nd, 2010, but it was voted down. The resolution that was voted down read, “… LPA shall support the autonomous practice and regulation of the profession of psychology.”

LPA President Dr. Kelly Ray later wrote to members explaining her belief that the resolution was “…to build the foundation to take an offensive position against 251, against medical psychologists, and against the medical board.”

After the Council rejected the resolution in October, Dardard asked about 50 of those she had polled if they would agree to sign a petition to call a special meeting to discuss the resolution. She submitted this request to the Council members by email on October 29th at about 4:30 pm. At about 6:30 pm one of the petitioners received an email asking him about his signature, and the list was attached. (See PT, 2,4)

Dr. Pellegrin, an LPA member and president of Grassroots of Psychology in Louisiana, posted to Grassroots listserv after the leak became public in December. Pellegrin wrote, “This raises concerns on many levels. While Grassroots did nothing to encourage this breach, we apologize to the petitioners who rightly believed that the LPA Council members would respect their privacy. I will be placing my name on the next EC agenda to ask for a full and thorough explanation. I will report to the signers and to Grassroots regarding this unfortunate situation.”

In a recent interview with the Times, Dr. Pellegrin said she attended the council meeting in January and asked who had forwarded the names and why. Dr. Jessica Brown, LPA Secretary and Legislative Chair explained that she had not forwarded the list to Dr. Quillin, but she had asked for a “third party” to help her investigate the names on the petition. Brown was not willing to disclose the identity of this third person.

Pellegrin also told the Times that she asked why a third party was needed and Brown said that she was under time pressures and required assistance.

Pellegrin said that she also asked why Brown had not requested help from the LPA Executive Director, and that Brown indicated that because of the new bylaws she felt it was her responsibility to handle all the issues of a special meeting.

Also Pellegrin asked why the validity of the names on the petition was questioned and noted that Brown said that she felt it was necessary to take another step to find out if people knew what they were agreeing to sign.

In December President Ray had told the petitioner who had been questioned by Dr. Quillin, that the reason the list was given to a third party was because there were names that were “unknown to us.” (See PT, 2,4.) Ray had noted that a council member had contacted “others” to inquire about these “unknown” persons. Ray did not explain why the executive director had not been enlisted for help or why the petitioners had not been contacted directly.

Dr. Brown apologized for the error on her part and offered to be sanctioned. However, the council did not sanction Brown, according to Dr. Pellegrin.

“Several times during the meeting,” Dr. Pellegrin said to the Times, “Dr. Ray stated that she was not willing to discuss or rehash the issues. I don’t know what she thought I was coming there for, if not to discuss the issues.”

Like a number of other medical psychologists, Dr. Ray is a member of LA Academy of Medical Psychologists – Political Action Committee, the group responsible for Act 251.

According to sources, organizers tabled the petition for an LPA special meeting for a number of reasons.


This article is part of a historical newspaper archive. Read the original issue for its original layout, photographs and graphics.

Dr. Dardard Calls for Leadership

Article archive / February 1, 2011

Originally published: . Volume 2, No. 6. Source pages: 2, 3.

Dear Colleagues,

In August 2010 LPA member Alicia Pellegrin initiated a discussion about a resolution, drafted by several members in response to Act 251, which supported the independent practice of psychology. The new LPA president, Kelly Ray, promptly took the position that this topic was off the table.

Alarmed by this closed stance on such a critical matter, I decided to conduct an independent telephone survey of members about the resolution. Ignoring the issue seemed unfair to those who needed some way to voice their concerns. 105 members contacted voted in favor of the resolution.

In the following letter to the EC I describe what happened next, along with my observations and recommendations. Essentially, the survey results were summarily dismissed, momentum for a special meeting was squelched, an attitude of distrust prevailed, and my good faith efforts were rejected.

I believe that LPA needs an outside facilitator to teach us how to resolve conflicts constructively and to guide us through the complex and pressing issues of identity facing our profession. Anything less, such as a town hall meeting or members’ forum, would only scratch the surface of our problems.

Where is the leader willing to take this risk on our behalf?

January 14, 2011 Dear Members of the LPA Executive Council,

The last contact I had with you was on Friday, October 29th, at 4:19 p.m., when I sent you a resolution petition for a special meeting about the autonomy of psychology in Louisiana, prompted by your vote against a resolution in support of the autonomy of psychology at the EC meeting on Friday, October 22nd.

I now believe, based on three key events, that LPA leadership is closed to an open discussion about the autonomy of psychology, or to any honest dialogue with those erroneously perceived as outsiders.

The first event was the EC meeting in which the autonomy resolution was voted down. The process walled off outside input and authentic discussion about this and other matters. For example, during membership discussions, no EC member acknowledged information offered earlier about academic dues options. A protracted but vague description of legislative threats served to heighten the wall of exclusion.

The second event was the formal email response to my petition, requesting an exact purpose for the meeting that, despite careful wording to the contrary, came across as resistance to such a meeting. I would have expected a phone call to discuss how to iron out any problems with the petition, demonstrating a willingness to work together toward compromise. Instead, I sensed that obstacles were being placed in the path of getting a special meeting.

The third event was the breech of boundaries that occurred when the special meeting petition signees list was forwarded promptly to LAMP leader Jim Quillin. I wondered why no one contacted me. I would have been happy to help verify signees’ identities. This action confirmed my impression that EC leaders show favoritism toward the LAMP agenda, distrust my sincere intentions and actions, and are unwilling to genuinely address the will of the broader membership.

I have concluded that further pursuit of a special meeting, forum, or program of any kind on the autonomy of psychology, though vital to the health of our association, is premature until our leadership better understands and is more open to the importance of this need. I look forward to that time.

Sincerely, Susan Dardard

Dr. Susan Dardard at Gray Ranch on Cattle Penning Day. (Photo courtesy of Kent LeDoux, Gray Ranch manager.)


This article is part of a historical newspaper archive. Read the original issue for its original layout, photographs and graphics.

“Women in Leadership” Applications Sought by APA

Article archive / February 1, 2011

Originally published: . Volume 2, No. 6. Source pages: 3.

APA’s committee for Women in Psychology’s Fourth Annual Leadership Institute for Women in Psychology (LIWP) will be held August 2-3, 2011, in Washington, DC. This year 60 women will be accepted to the Institute, 30 from academic and 30 from clinical or consulting settings. The mission of the LIWP is to empower, prepare and support women psychologists as leaders.

Go to: (http://www.apa.org/pi/women/programs/leadership/faq.aspx) or contact Dr. Shari Miles-Cohen at APA, who is the Senior Director, Women’s Programs Office, in Public Interest Directorate, for more information.


This article is part of a historical newspaper archive. Read the original issue for its original layout, photographs and graphics.