Article archive / December 1, 2009
Originally published: . Volume 1, No. 4. Source pages: 1, 3.
In his presentation at the National Academy of Neuropsychology’s 29th Conference in New Orleans last month, Dr. James Quillin spoke to a group of attendees about the need for Act 251, the Medical Psychology Practice Act. In his review, he presented the rationale behind the Act, noting that it was a moral decision, based on the realization that the practice of medical psychology had evolved into something more than it was originally designed to be, and that the “moral issue,” he said, “boiled down to the fact that MPs are practicing medicine.”
When asked by PT why another model was not decided on, specifically one that did not require two regulatory bodies for psychology, Dr. Quillin noted that there were issues from a public policy standpoint and a matter of public safety.
During his presentation, he said, "When we went to the legislature in 2004 they tried to point this out, these are dangerous medications…" And he added, "Strictly political, we were able to counter that…" But he said, "Morally we found out they were right."
Dr. Quillin also highlighted the need for compromise in political venues due to the “mood of the legislature” in regard to scope of practice issues. He said that the 2004 bill had “torn the legislature apart,” and that they were “sick and tired of scope of practice matters.” He noted that, “We discussed with the Chair of the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee our concern about how this might adversely affect our concerns about the practice of medical psychology.” He also mentioned that he and others understood that if they came back, they should be “Singing Kumbayah,” or they could be “punished.”
Dr. Quillin’s review of Act 251 began at the last 15 minutes of the two-hour session. Other presenters were Dr. John Mendoza, speaking on neuropsychology regulations, Dr. John Bolter, speaking on the 2004 law, and Dr. John Courtney, speaking on MP practice. While advertised to include audience participation, there was no time left at the end for formal Q&A. However, both Dr. Quillin and Dr. Bolter entertained questions by PT and Grassroots President after close of the session. The session was not recorded for commercial sale.
Dr. James Quillin and Dr. Mike Chafetz in a moment of levity while discussing Act 251 at NAN presentation.
Grassroots President Dr. Mike Chafetz and Secretary Dr. Kim VanGeffen chat at the NAN presentation.
This article is part of a historical newspaper archive. Read the original issue for its original layout, photographs and graphics.