Article archive / October 1, 2016
Originally published: . Volume 7, No. 10. Source pages: 13.
In an unprecedented move, the psychology board voted to ask the state Ethics Board about the top vote-getter’s suitability to serve, since she might have to recuse herself.
Ethics said the issue was irrelevant to them. The high number of cases predicted that would require recusal and so hinder the board’s functioning, has not materialized.
The other candidate was a medical psychologist.
This article is part of a historical newspaper archive. Read the original issue for its original layout, photographs and graphics.